🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an celebration that started out as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate gatherings where African descendants are compensated to address white audiences about hidden biases and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has developed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and increasingly on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the method the month is commemorated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how important it is to rethink Black History Month better than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we observed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a legislator feels empowered to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a source of worry. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the United States, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A drive to remove African American heritage and narrative from the archives is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration symbolises how insufficiently it can be influential if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the realities of the current era. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. An academic expert, a educator at University of Greenwich, put it best when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just do away with events including Black History Month completely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an period that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an framework that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not evade politics, and leaves space for citizens, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves mere awareness of the past when it ignores the current situation of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Organizations who celebrate it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and awareness of “microaggressions”, but faced with the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an complete renaming is necessary – Black History is Now Month.